Key conditional.
Speeding, drinking, highway violations, witchcraft, pedophilia, and being Donald Rumsfeld are all completely irrelevant to the question of whether the driver was under the influence of alcohol.
Is there evidence that he was? None conclusive enough to warrant a Guilty vote...
Remember, kids: whenever you make an appeal to authority, everyone else loves it when you don't even name the authority involved!
RESPECTABLE SOURCES ARE FOR LOSERS
"I had to do it" and "I was right/good/justified in doing it" are fundamentally different concepts. In the former case, you should be sincerely apologetic and dismayed by the choice you were forced to make; in the latter case, you should be proudly and arrogantly defending the choice you made...
Keeping Hoover, Nixon, Johnson, et al firmly in mind, and supposing 1 to be the worst president possible: some indeterminate place below 5.
Don't ask me to name one good thing Bush has done, though, because I couldn't. I guess it counts to his credit that the nation hasn't imploded yet.