ValveTime.co.uk | Valve News, Forums, Steam

I hate to say it, but you know how Valve were making the Source engine for so long and put in so much money into it? From a point of view that was a waste...

It took 5 whole years for Valve to make Source and you saw the vids/screens etc. on it. But, Epic, the creators of Unreal, have been making an engine for Unreal 3 for about 18 months and is due out on 2006, in these 18 months of development the graphics look about 5 times better than Half-Life 2's, even the physics look better... Weigh it, 18 months. 5 years.

There's a huge difference... :(

If you want proof google the keyword "Unreal 3" (Without the ")

But, that's only from a technological point of view, I mean Half-Life 1 lasted this long, I think Half-Life 2 will last quite long aswell.

:cheers:


What do you think?
Back
Top