Recent content by hasan

leib10: They're dying because soldiers in any army are trained to obey orders blindly. That's how the military work. They're dying because of the idiocy of the politicians who sent them there. Now, each soldier probably has a theory in his mind as to why he's fighting. I think the major cause is...

meh, like I care. Are you nuts?? Did you read the first line of my post (not including the intro)? Don't ever make the stupid remarks that American soldiers are dying for Iraqis!! That's the dumbest thing you could ever say. All I'm saying: You can't just step in to mess up Iraq then leave as...

because they've had it shoved up their *** since childhood/teen-age that religion is stupid. They find extremely discomforting that Muslims at large don't have such a view, and that they infact take Islam very seriously. Which translates in your bran to "stupid", "barbaric", etc. Just so you...

Because I think Iran is responsible for much of the mess in Iraq *. They're responsible directly for the sectarian cleansing in Baghdad, Basra, Baquba, etc. what I want is for them to be weakened so that they can't intervene in our biznis anymore. Having the US attack them could be one way of...

btw you wasted my time too, now I'm not gonna manage to comprehend any of today's lectures .. with only one hour of sleep! (if I even manage to sleep it)

your friend is google, you have a keyboard .. just go for it Dude, have you taken even a basic course in psychology? that's no scientific evidence. That's just one research on a sample; in psychology !!! You probably don't know what that means!!

rofl .. are you as dumb as you sound? lololol are you really serious?

did you read #163? http://www.halflife2.net/forums/showpost.php?p=2591679&postcount=163

you don't get it. so what if they watch sex? and what if they don't handle it correctly?? is one of them gonna rape the other? why? does he even have an interest in sex at his age?

but that's the reason he cited for banning one, yet it cannot be the reason for banning the other. therefor this comparison is pointless. Do you know how to argue?? seriously ..

are you talking about public sex? he said it's ok, you said it's not. I AM trying to convince you .. by asking the ridiculous question of public sex. but you seem to be dodging around it.

umm, allowing protest is a basic freedom principle, you can't ban protests on the principle that it involves bystanders without their content.

And can you remind me what was your response for when I asked you why public sex and children-watching-sex shouldn't be allowed?

Guys, don't give me links, I hate linking and copy-pasting. If you've got nothing to say, just stop arguing. If you think you're point is too obvious, you shouldn't, because I too think my point is to obvious, yet I am engaging in this seemingly pointless argument .. trying to see where it's...

eh? I think you are the dense one, arguing so boldly without any hesitation that homosexuality is perfectly ok. without providing any reason why, other than "just because".