Recent content by jondy

^^ Outstanding. Do it, for the good of insufferable meaning-seekers everywhere.

Are you sure she's not just after attention? Feed her SMBC comics until she feels better.

Does anybody else have stuttering issues with it? I have a Radeon 6850 and 4 gigs of ram, and after about 1 minute of play it'll start ... juddering every four or five seconds. FPS is usually in the 40s-50s, but the stutter makes it lag like balls. Ultimate balls. Which is a shame, because I'm...

I really, really hope so, because graphically this looks pretty awful, and we're not really in a position to talk about anything else.

Solaris, I'm not sure what you've been reading, but this account of the Irish famine is just horrible. Not that the famine has anything to do with this discussion.

Right-wing politics has always been more pragmatic than left. I'm not sure you can say that the latter are more ideologically driven - I mean, the 'small state' is pretty explicit ideology - but I'm sure that this is why, generally speaking, right wing politicians fare better in terms of...

ITT: Trolldodds fielding incredible retcon tekkers!

I thought the best scene was the Ministry thing, when actual actors played the original trio better than they played themselves. still kindof enjoyed the movie though

On the other hand, if women could grow arrow-shaped chest hair like that dude, possibly with a line above it saying 'I'm up here', I think we'd be a way toward solving this problem

On some fundamental level I kindof agree with what you're saying, but I don't think the distinction is all that useful, or even coherent - rooting through your partners e-mails for these kind of reasons seems to constitute 'acting unethically in a relationship' however you do it. But yeah, if...

lol @ the analog mixers thing

I cried with laughter. Whyy

Justice /= vengeance, right? Or maybe I'm missing something here.

If you posted the article intending to stimulate debate or what-have-you, you must have assumed that the content of the article was worthy of debate, ie not full of shit. As the article clearly is full of shit, it's not a useful discussion point. So you either - didn't read the article with a...

Well, yeah. Now that it's been established - and it didn't take much work - that the story is nonsense, the article itself is pretty worthless. What kind of discussion were you hoping to generate?