Hackers/Source Leak Scapegoat?

Edge

Newbie
Joined
Sep 21, 2003
Messages
686
Reaction score
0
Have any of you stopped to consider...

HL2 came out of nowhere... sure it was in production but noone seen or heard anything about it until E3. Their #1 competitor (Doom3) was riding high on the PR wave when HL2 stole the show and became the talk of the town. Don't you think it is odd that other than the E3 video we have not seen or heard anything HL2 related even though it has become an overnight phenomenon.

What if all of this is a huge PR move. What if April 2004 was the planned release date anyways and they released a date of 09/2003 to scare off the Doom3 guys and get an early jump on the hype.

Did you notice after the HL2 demo at E3 ID announced Doom3 was delayed?

I truly think VALVe had no intention on releasing HL2 this year but instead played the PR game at the fans expense.

Steam sure did get popular since everyone thought 9/03 was the release and they were required to get Steam for HL2. Coincendence that we are all beta testing steam now :)

At one time I actually thought I would be playing HL2 by 09/03 then holidays 2003... 2004 just seems so far away. I feel like we were tricked :(

Honestly the way this whole thing has been handled... leak, no benchmark, no information, Steam, and false statements when they speak sentances.. I wouldn't doubt it if HL2 itself turns out to be all hype. Can you imagine HL2 being delivered in a playable format? That thought no longer exists in my mind.. what a mess :flame:
 
isnt this saposed to be in the rumar forum... and i kinda see your side of conspirecy theory but i think you watch too much tv
 
Originally posted by c0de
isnt this saposed to be in the rumar forum... and i kinda see your side of conspirecy theory but i think you watch too much tv

This isn't a rumor? It is an opinion.

You must not have read the entire message.. I apologize for it being lengthy :( I know formulated sentances can be difficult at your age :bounce:
 
uninformed speculation from a conspiracy thneorist.
 
Originally posted by |MaTT|
uninformed speculation from a conspiracy thneorist.

Wha??

Do you fanboys have a mind of your own anymore?

You DISCOUNT everything unless "Gabe says so.." Newsflash Gabe ain't saying shit.. What DO YOU think? Or are you not able to do that anymore?
 
Originally posted by Edge
This isn't a rumor? It is an opinion.

You must not have read the entire message.. I apologize for it being lengthy :(

no i read it it just seamed like more a speculation then fact, or opinion
 
ture its a pretty dumb idear. were u smokng sumthin wen u came up with that thught
 
i think "Gabe" and other moderators are getting pissed off at looking at this gheyd up forum
 
Originally posted by kingkum
ture its a pretty dumb idear. were u smokng sumthin wen u came up with that thught

Let me help you junior.

"Sure is a pretty dumb idea. We're you smoking something when you came up with that thought?
 
I never said i pray at the altar of gabe..... for all i care the game could be out in 2046... I no longer care anymore... im just saying you are only speculating for the sake of speculation...
 
Originally posted by c0de
no i read it it just seamed like more a speculation then fact, or opinion

Main Entry: spec·u·late
1 a : to meditate on or ponder a subject

Main Entry: pon·der
2 : to think about : reflect on

Main Entry: opin·ion
1 a : a view, judgment, or appraisal formed in the mind about a particular matter

Do you even know the meaning of the words you are using?
 
Does it matter why? if im supposed to wait until april next year, i wont buy the damn game. !! if its a salespropaganda, its like the worst ive ever seen, (it even worse than the unprofessional statements from Gabe, Valve and VU alltogether)
 
This is just a case of poor judgement and PR on behalf of valve.... nothing more...
 
Well just think with the demo out now.. and part of the source maybe we will have some cool mods to play with the demo to tie us over until April 2004 :D
 
That might be true..

Currently.. it kinda seems like it.

What other games are being released by vivendi people during this time frame? because.. if HL2 came out 9/30 .. i'm preetty sure no one would have bought any other games from any one for a while
 
That is an interesting theory Edge, and one a few friends and I also considered.

What makes me think that it may not be the case is the sheer amount of information released in the source leak - including licensed code.
(I have not read through the code, only read what others who have have said about it).
A Beta leak, or early Valve source code leak I could understand, but the inclusion of costly 3rd party software is what makes me unsure.


I am still undecided, but I certainly think there is more to the delay & leak than we are being told.


Leak or no, I feel pretty sure that the Septmeber 30th date would have been missed. And if you believe what Fragmaster (and others) said, Valve/Vivenda have known they couldn't make the 30/9 date for a looong time.
 
Originally posted by Edge
Main Entry: spec·u·late
1 a : to meditate on or ponder a subject

Main Entry: pon·der
2 : to think about : reflect on

Main Entry: opin·ion
1 a : a view, judgment, or appraisal formed in the mind about a particular matter

Do you even know the meaning of the words you are using?

yeah you are a friggin dumb ass man come on now your are speculating one of you judgments on a particular matter you can speculat an opinion you dumb shmuck. i said it seems more like your speculating then forming an opinion an opinion would be like yeah this suck that hl2 has been delayed. not hl2 has been delayed becuase they secretly got nuked. you ****ing dumb ass
 
I take Edges side on this one. You're all so eager to tear down his idea, his opinion. Because you want to remain on Valves side. Loyal to Valve. But has Valve been loyal to you?
 
i already said his point makes sense, i never disagread with him, i just said i think this is the wrong forum for it. but hey what do i know, ive just been reading this ****ing crap since september on these forums
 
Originally posted by c0de
i already said his point makes sense, i never disagread with him, i just said i think this is the wrong forum for it. but hey what do i know, ive just been reading this ****ing crap since september on these forums

I didn't say they were nuked.. I said they were ****ing with us for the sake of publicity.
 
Originally posted by Edge
Let me help you junior.

"Sure is a pretty dumb idea. We're you smoking something when you came up with that thought?
I think you were looking for the word 'were' - Second person singular and plural and first and third person plural past indicative of be. 'We're' - we are, therefore, "We are you smoking something when you came up with that thought" makes no sense. ;) Sorry to be a dick but don't try to be the grammer police around here. As far as all these delays go, it has not yet been confirmed, the publisher annouced it, not the developer. The publisher doesn't do any coding so they don't know shit. Also, this should be in the rumors area as you are simply going on speculation, there is no evidance in your post.

- Paul
 
Originally posted by Edge
I didn't say they were nuked.. I said they were ****ing with us for the sake of publicity.

ok will you seriously stop being dumb for 2 seconds.. that was an example that wasnt what you said...
 
Originally posted by No Limit
I think you were looking for the word 'were' - Second person singular and plural and first and third person plural past indicative of be. 'We're' - we are, therefore, "We are you smoking something when you came up with that thought" makes no sense. ;) Sorry to be a dick but don't try to be the grammer police around here. As far as all these delays go, it has not yet been confirmed, the publisher annouced it, not the developer. The publisher doesn't do any coding so they don't know shit. Also, this should be in the rumors area as you are simply going on speculation, there is no evidance in your post.

- Paul

Thanks for the correction.. I didn't catch that one.

Publisher == person who fronts the cash to make the discs. If they don't publish the game it can't come out.. so if VU says it is delayed on CNN.com then guess what folks... IT IS DELAYED.

Remember they said it was delayed last time well before VALVe said anything... see a trend?
 
edge, you kick ass, these n00bs dont have brains and just go with the flow, like ****ing preps. or... SHEEP!

Anyway... as out there your opinion is, ... kind out sounds possible.

If so, then why are they play testing? Play testing a not completed game?
 
ok let me break it down since some of you are having a difficult time grasping the point of this thread..

HALF-LIFE2 is DELAYED till 2004.

Do you find it supsicious that HACKERS are BEING BLAMED?

Isn't in VALVe's best interest to find a SCAPEGOAT instead of fessing up that this was a PR STUNT and the game is not even done?
 
And hasn't their (Valve's) PR stunt worked wonderfully? I mean, you couldn't buy better publicity than Half Life 2 is getting nowadays. Though many of us are ticked off by the delay (again), we'll all still buy it, except perhaps those that were only ever going to download it anyway.
 
Originally posted by Kevin Anderson
And hasn't their (Valve's) PR stunt worked wonderfully? I mean, you couldn't buy better publicity than Half Life 2 is getting nowadays. Though many of us are ticked off by the delay (again), we'll all still buy it, except perhaps those that were only ever going to download it anyway.

Yes it has worked wonderfully.. I never claimed it didn... ahh **** it.. you people can't discuss shit.. if you don't flame you are lost for words..
 
Calm down Edge. I hardly ever post, I just read other posts. Yours I happened to agree with, so I replied. There was no sarcasm or flaming in my post. Read it again, with a positive mental attitude! :)
 
Originally posted by Kevin Anderson
Calm down Edge. I hardly ever post, I just read other posts. Yours I happened to agree with, so I replied. There was no sarcasm or flaming in my post. Read it again, with a positive mental attitude! :)

Again.. I didn't say you had sarcasm.. I just get tired of explaining everythng and you happened to be who I was replying too.. it wasnt directed at you.. nor did I imply it was. I was venting.
 
Understood. Vent away! I still agree with you though.
 
HL2 publishing house Vivendi, which is a publicly traded company, can't play 'games' like you are proposing on the stock market or they would get sued to kingdom come.

I can't see any reason, why Vivendi would not have wanted to get the game out to market and boost their Q4 profits and pump up their stock price. They would have been insane not to want to do it, and act criminally if they did all this as a publicity stunt, as you suggest.

Get out more and stop thinking everything is a conspiracy. Sometimes the truth is weirder than fiction, but truth nevertheless.

HL2 source code (or part of it) got stolen and published on the web. All sorts of contractual, legal, criminal and coding problems blew up on Vivendi's / Valve's faces. Game is delayed. That's the most likely truth to the matter.

Let's move on from the silly 12-year old conspiracy theories, shall we.
 
Back
Top