Realism sucks

15357

Companion Cube
Joined
Jan 11, 2005
Messages
15,209
Reaction score
23
For one, everybody's commiting war crimes and violating Subsection B of the Geneva International Conference of 1863. Medics should be unarmed and people should take a point off for directly shooting and killing one.

For two, No blood!

For three, the HUD of the M1A1(or was it 2?) is wrong. There is supposed to be coordinates of its position by relation of the MCP.

For Four, the LAV's wheels don't move correctly whilst turning.

For five, there are too many missles attached to the Tunguska. Its supposed to have only 2.

For six, its a game.


My head hurts. Its 3:22am. GTGT sleep.
 
Oh and also: AT missles do not act the way they are supposed to. ATMs DO HAVE a HE core in them, so that they can kill a 10-meter radius.
 
Yeah, so? The Battlefield series has never been all that realistic...The fundamental concept that they try to balance out the armies is rather unrealistic too...
 
Medical soldiers are always armed with the standard British weaponary. I presume so for any army. :|
 
Canadian Gunner said:
Yeah, so? The Battlefield series has never been all that realistic...The fundamental concept that they try to balance out the armies is rather unrealistic too...
I believe thats his point.
 
+ what soldier trains his ass off and can only sprint for, what, like 6 seconds? If I was being shot at by like a tank or a jet or something, I'd be effing MOVING.
 
:O

Can I have your autograph? :P

Yeah, so? The Battlefield series has never been all that realistic...The fundamental concept that they try to balance out the armies is rather unrealistic too...

My point exactly. :D

If it hadn't been an online game, I'd have made it like 300 PLA vs 130 USMC for balance.

+ what soldier trains his ass off and can only sprint for, what, like 6 seconds? If I was being shot at by like a tank or a jet or something, I'd be effing MOVING.

:laugh: QFMFT.
 
Mr Stabby said:
real war is not meant to be fun, tbh

NO WAI, RLY?

If you've ever shot a gun in real life, then you'd know that there are NO realistic FPS'.
 
sinkoman said:
NO WAI, RLY?

If you've ever shot a gun in real life, then you'd know that there are NO realistic FPS'.

America's Army's likely the closest simulation. I've never shot a SAW or M16 in my life so I can't verify it though.
 
john3571000 said:
Between Anal/Incredible Military Realism and Battlefield 2's gameplay awesomeness, I may never have to buy another game bar Spore for years :D

Anal, Military realism and gameplay.

One of the above does not belong.
 
bliink said:
Anal, Military realism and gameplay.

One of the above does not belong.

Military...

Realistic Anal Gameplay = Armed Assault!
 
Back
Top