too much ? (BIG SPOILERS) apparantly.. so don't whine if you look inside and see!

  • Thread starter Thread starter nagual678
  • Start date Start date
N

nagual678

Guest
it has been repeated, and is accepted as a fact, that there will be many surprises regarding weapons, etc.. in HL2, i.e that they only showed us a fragment. i don't feel like that. if the spoilers are right, we have seen about 95% of the weapons in the binks, and far more than two tiers of the enemies. it feels like valve was so excited to show off what they came up with that they spoiled everything. what do you think ? i feel like only the storyline holds any surprise anymore.
 
DONT READ THIS TOPIC IF YOU DONT LIKE MILD SPOILERING!!!



*
*





I agree.. what happened to all the 'secret stuff' they were 'keeping' from us?
 
I think they found there was no time to finish it.. and will either do it later or not atall.
 
The Dark Elf said:
I think they found there was no time to finish it.. and will either do it later or not atall.

I wouldnt mind waiting a few more months you know.. if it meant adding in all the stuff they wanted to. Alternatively- give me it now! expansion pack for free later!
 
Or maybe they just cut them, thinking they had no purpose or didn't work out as fun as they had hoped...
 
bliink said:
I wouldnt mind waiting a few more months you know.. if it meant adding in all the stuff they wanted to. Alternatively- give me it now! expansion pack for free later!
Same here.. "allegedly";) the stuff that was cut would have been very cool locations/scenes. And I still think its a shame they didn't do something properly with the 7 hours invasion.

I doubt there would be enough in there to warrent charging for an expansion, but I guess they still could, blue shift wasn't free and that was tiny really.
 
...you...wouldn't mind...waiting another...few months...fow half life 2? :frown:
 
aerasal said:
...you...wouldn't mind...waiting another...few months...fow half life 2? :frown:

If the stuff they wanted to include was "really cool" yeah.. I still trust valve to some degree lol...
 
i want hl2 now! :angry: they can add all the stuff later with a free expansion :D
 
dont you think maybe, the're gonna use the stuff that they cut out for later expansion packs? (guns, maps, etc.) that would be cool i guess... if we do get a different perspective like opposing force and get to use new weapons and explore new areas. thats what i think anyway.
 
Its gameplay that matters, we all know HL2 is gona shag GTA and Halo (And even D3 :cheese: ) up the ass :O , so whats the problem with it?
:frown:
 
Tight-ass Llama said:
Its gameplay that matters, we all know HL2 is gona shag GTA and Halo (And even D3 :cheese: ) up the ass :O , so whats the problem with it?
:frown:

i was feeling like discussing some points with you, but since you obviously have prophetic powers and you know things no one else knows, you must also know in advance what i would have told you. consequently, it would be pointless to argue with you since you already have answers to every point i could advance.

also, you have the gift of controlling people's mind, or at least you are omniscient (also an interesting ability) that lets you say that "we all" not only think but KNOW that HL2 is "gona shag" not only one nor two but three games.
The problem is that two of these aren't even on the same platform as HL2, so that must mean you either have lightspeed programming abilities and you already ported GTA SA and HALO 2 on PC, in order to have reasonable grounds to compare games. or, continuing in the trend of omniscience, you already know that the aforementioned two games (that aren't on PC yet, and in consequence not comparable to PC games), if they were ported on PC, would be inferior to HL2 (a game wich isn't even out yet).

on this matter, one is forced to say "good job". no need to precise the fact that D3 will be inferior to HL2 since you managed to foretell things that could very well not happen : the latter task (comparing D3 to HL2) would be merely third grade homework compared to what you just achieved. good job again.

in conclusion, i am sorry for even considering about arguing with you since you are obviously of a superiour breed of masterminds. but this post is useless, as you, obviously, already know its content.
 
nagual678 said:
i was feeling like discussing some points with you, but since you obviously have prophetic powers and you know things no one else knows, you must also know in advance what i would have told you. consequently, it would be pointless to argue with you since you already have answers to every point i could advance.

also, you have the gift of controlling people's mind, or at least you are omniscient (also an interesting ability) that lets you say that "we all" not only think but KNOW that HL2 is "gona shag" not only one nor two but three games.
The problem is that two of these aren't even on the same platform as HL2, so that must mean you either have lightspeed programming abilities and you already ported GTA SA and HALO 2 on PC, in order to have reasonable grounds to compare games. or, continuing in the trend of omniscience, you already know that the aforementioned two games (that aren't on PC yet, and in consequence not comparable to PC games), if they were ported on PC, would be inferior to HL2 (a game wich isn't even out yet).

on this matter, one is forced to say "good job". no need to precise the fact that D3 will be inferior to HL2 since you managed to foretell things that could very well not happen : the latter task (comparing D3 to HL2) would be merely third grade homework compared to what you just achieved. good job again.

in conclusion, i am sorry for even considering about arguing with you since you are obviously of a superiour breed of masterminds. but this post is useless, as you, obviously, already know its content.
This post is a complete waste of time. You are a sarcastic bastard.
I just cut down your post so you can edit it so you don't come off as a such a douche bag. You can thank me later.

"The problem is that two of these aren't even on the same platform as HL2."
 
i don't know about the bastard part, but i'm sarcastic an love every bit of it. for what you call a waste of time, i am the only judge of what it is since i am the only one having written it, and i had quite some fun doing so, so it's not a "waste of time". or maybe it's one for you reading it, then again, no one asked you to to do so, also because you are absolutely not involved in this discussion.
i certainly won't thank you for giving me the advice of watering down my post and killing any bit of fun i see in it.
 
You're right, I'm not involved, but I call them as I see them.
It seems to me you get your kicks by spouting off semi-intelligent sounding drivel and poking fun at others who don't share your (apparently) fun-filled negativity.
No one asked me to read that. I read it because I made the very bad assumption of thinking some people prefer to contribute positively to discussions.
Seriously, give the prickishness a rest.
 
IonizeMyAtoms said:
You're right, I'm not involved, but I call them as I see them.
It seems to me you get your kicks by spouting off semi-intelligent sounding drivel and poking fun at others who don't share your (apparently) fun-filled negativity.
No one asked me to read that. I read it because I made the very bad assumption of thinking some people prefer to contribute positively to discussions.
Seriously, give the prickishness a rest.

you are in fact right. without any sarcasm here, i DO get my kicks by spouting semi-intelligent (sorry for the semi, but as english is not my mother tongue i am limited in what i normally excel to do) sounding drivel.
but you are being a little too harsh on the "poking fun" part. i basically pointed out the mindlessness of what Tight-ass Llama said in a way i judged if not funny or entertaining, at least original. why negativity ? is criticism not allowed here ? it sounds like i am wrong for pointing out the fact that some people are a bit too much enthusiastic in judging a game that isn't even out yet, and comparing it to games that, quite frankly, i view as a possibility that Tight-ass Llama never played, at least in part.
if i had been less sarcastic, and pointed out this more directly, would my participation have been more constructive ? would i have sounded less negative ? i don't see why.
can you stop insulting me ? the terms you dub me with don't really ass to your points, IMHO it rather detracts from them and give you less credibility.
 
I'm insulting you because I don't appreciate patronizing remarks, whether they are directed at me or not.
Yeah, his post was a little over the top, but most of the posts are, everyone's very excited about the game.
But I'm done. And for the record, your english is quite good.
 
lots of flaming going on... everyone's getting tense with hl2 around the corner :p
 
That must be it... we just want to play! Is that so much to ask!
Seriously, I have a class at 8 Tuesday morning, meaning I have to leave my place at around 6.30... I'm waking up at 5 so I can get some play time in
 
Super Mario Bros will still own Half-Life 2 and all these kind of games. HAIL LUIGI!
 
Back
Top