What do think ?
Is it better to release HL 2 as soon as possible, with the assurances that fans will be happy to patch it to full functionality ?
Or
Go the long route, beta test it and remove as many bugs as possible before releasing HL 2 to the fans ?
There are pros and cons to both sides of the argument and may make an intresting debate.
For instance a Release an' Patch supporter could argue that with Steam around patching should be easier, so it makes sense to allow gamers to play and report the bugs.
Of course the wait for it supporters could argue that the Steam system is full of bugs itself, and its taking a while to squash those bugs... would players be willing to wait for patches if a fatal bug cause sections of the game to be unplayable ?
Disclaimer : This is not a "hurry up and release the game, Valve" thread nor a "Quit whining about the delay, let Valve do its job properly" thread, its a "debate on the Pros and Cons of Release an' Patch vs Wait for it " Thread
Is it better to release HL 2 as soon as possible, with the assurances that fans will be happy to patch it to full functionality ?
Or
Go the long route, beta test it and remove as many bugs as possible before releasing HL 2 to the fans ?
There are pros and cons to both sides of the argument and may make an intresting debate.
For instance a Release an' Patch supporter could argue that with Steam around patching should be easier, so it makes sense to allow gamers to play and report the bugs.
Of course the wait for it supporters could argue that the Steam system is full of bugs itself, and its taking a while to squash those bugs... would players be willing to wait for patches if a fatal bug cause sections of the game to be unplayable ?
Disclaimer : This is not a "hurry up and release the game, Valve" thread nor a "Quit whining about the delay, let Valve do its job properly" thread, its a "debate on the Pros and Cons of Release an' Patch vs Wait for it " Thread