chili pepper
Newbie
- Joined
- May 17, 2003
- Messages
- 165
- Reaction score
- 0
This time from GameSpot, for anyone who might be curious. I only read some of it, but this sums it up:
"It's not that there weren't plenty of great-looking games at E3, because there certainly were. It's just that none really compared to Half-Life 2. It's like we were looking at a game from two or three E3s into the future, rather than something comparable to the already high current standards of gaming quality. "
http://www.gamespot.com/gamespot/features/all/e3_2003/bestof/31.html
"It's not that there weren't plenty of great-looking games at E3, because there certainly were. It's just that none really compared to Half-Life 2. It's like we were looking at a game from two or three E3s into the future, rather than something comparable to the already high current standards of gaming quality. "
http://www.gamespot.com/gamespot/features/all/e3_2003/bestof/31.html
