Recent content by Ol'Master

Opps, was thinking in consoles.

Twice that (40 GDP). We get ripped off.

As much as I detest Yahtzee's opinion of Sigur Ros, the video was up to his usual form and I should probably take solace in the fact it's taken me this long to be offended by anything he says.

The majority of the features you mentioned are San Andreas specific, I would hardly say removing them makes them feel less 'GTAish'. I found the RPG elements pretty tedious, and I never modded cars, but I can see your point. To be honest I thought things like 'you can get fat if you eat too...

Would have been awesome if they had 'New York, I Love You But You're Bringing Me Down', it fits the tone of the game perfectly although it would have been a bit surreal...

Mail's been and gone for me and it's not arrived :frown:. I'm trying to console myself with San Andreas but it's not really helping...Anyone got their copy from gameplay.co.uk?

IGN UK review. Also 10/10.

His other Wiimote projects are pretty awesome too.

Looks like he has some naughty naughty illegal version of the game, check the sign at the beginning. Oh, and Luigi's a bastard for making that challenge...

I doubt Sony forced them to correct their images, especially as it seems to be an industry norm.

Don't know why people are blaming Sony, it's the developers that touched the pics up. It's a shoddy practice in the business though that really should be stopped. At least Guerilla had the guts to admit it.

Looking in to it you're right, he doesn't call himself a philosopher, which I'm glad to see. He basically takes philosophical arguments and makes them accessible to the general public, which I congratulate him for, but the bias and arrogance he puts behind it really is unacceptable for someone...

Cheers for proving my point.

Amateur philosophy is hilarious, and that goes for both sides of this argument. Although at least Kerberos is being reasonable in his posts and not merely using ad hominem arguments and being arrogant about his points.

Richard Dawkins is an abysmal 'philosopher'. He has no original points, and simplifies years of philosophical debate into arrogant arguments. Good scientist though.