knut
Party Escort Bot
- Joined
- Feb 24, 2005
- Messages
- 7,431
- Reaction score
- 20
I guess I was the only one that saw nothing but random explosions and people running around?
well, it is a war game. also a COD title
you were expecting something different?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I guess I was the only one that saw nothing but random explosions and people running around?
well, it is a war game. also a COD title
you were expecting something different?
itt: haters gonna hate
It's comforting to know that there will always be people that will shell out $60 as long you slap the right words on the box.
Same arguments in every CoD thread.
Nah, I like it here. It's nice and cozy. :3
Modern Warfare 1 was a first person shooter set in the modern day/near future with a plot that had a few gaps in logic but was for the most part fairly plausible and made the player feel like he was fighting on the frontlines of tomorrow's battlefield.
Modern Warfare 2 was an absurdly over the top and jingoistic first person shooter that felt like a film by Michael Bay. Storytelling logic was sacrificed for cinematic effect and drama, best exemplified in the Washington levels, and while Soap and Price were likeable and competent protagonists in MW1, MW2 turned into unabashed hero-worship of them, with each level basically the set-up for them doing something incredibly badass.
There are certain individuals in the MW community, such as myself, who had no problem with this. I can still respect other people's distaste for the new direction.
How dare an action game have repetitive and boring action.How dare this action game have action.
How dare an action game have repetitive and boring action.
Half-Life 2 manages to stay (mostly) fresh and not boring for the whole game. It's also not an action game.
I don't know a single person who qualifies all their opinions with IMO. It's self evident that something's an opinion, whether the person expressing it realizes it or not. And yes, saying IMO does weaken your point. It makes you sound unsure of whether you actually believe in what you're saying (and in some cases, that's actually appropriate, so go for it).
...
I did come in here to express a little hope for what this game could be, but then y'know... I reserve my right to harrass other people for what they enjoy.
Why does this game look dumb? Because the trailer is nothing but a series of random explosions and the series doesn't have a track record for being much else.
Why are you faulting something for being true to what it is?
If anything, say "it looks like Call of Duty" instead of "dumb".
I've been disappointed at the direction CoD has been heading ever since the first one. The series started out with a sort of Band of Brothers sort of feel to it, where the player was sort of an 'everyman'. The guy who parachuted into Normandy, or the guy with the ammo in Stalingrad. Obviously there was plenty of Hollywood flair and embellishment, but it always felt somewhat grounded in the story of a soldier. In the MW games it's less about being a soldier and more of an action hero. You go on snowmobile chases, you dual-wield submachine guns, you have heartbeat sensors on your guns, and you're inevitably responsible for saving the world. It worked pretty well in the original MW, but I feel like it went way too far in MW2 to the point of making the whole thing ridiculous. The old CoD games (and MoH games that came before) had way more impact.
Hey, game designers. STOP MAKING HOLLYWOOD MOVIE TRAILERS. IT DOESN'T WORK THAT WAY.
****ing christ, are they serious? "In a worrrrrrld... where everything you know is a lie." You mean like the fact that this game looks like every other phoned-in engine hijack Treyarch has gotten away with since they were let into the CoD fold? Welp I guess I'll go pre-order a copy then a hurf-de-derp-de-durr.