Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
....get a polo 1.4TDIas the second least CO2-emitting vehicle behind the Volkswagen Polo 1.4 TDI
A 2006 study by CNW Marketing Research, Inc. calculated the overall energy cost of a Prius at US$3.25 per mile and a Chevrolet Tahoe SUV at US$2.94 per mile. It concluded that 2005 hybrids cost "significantly more in overall energy costs than conventional Internal Combustion Engine (ICE) vehicles."[84] David Friedman of the Union of Concerned Scientists commented that the study "has been completely contradicted by studies from MIT, Argonne National Laboratory, and Carnegie Mellon's Lifecycle Assessment Group."[85] An article on the Better World Club website[86] investigates the source of the statement "a Hummer is more energy efficient over its lifetime than a Prius", which it characterizes as an urban legend. It suggests that the source may be the CNW "Dust to dust" study,[84] or follow-up articles by James L. Martin or Chris Demorro, and goes on to challenge some of the assumptions made in the study. A critique of the 2007 version of the CNW report by the Pacific Institute concluded that "closer inspection suggests that the report's conclusions rely on faulty methods of analysis, untenable assumptions, selective use and presentation of data, and a complete lack of peer review. Even the most cursory look reveals serious biases and flaws."[87]
In any case, even CNW Marketing has recognized the market has changed. Their 2007 update[88] for 2006 model year vehicles (see spreadsheet)[89] now lists the Prius as 25% less expensive per mile than the GMC Yukon, 28% less expensive than the Hummer H1 and 30% less expensive than the Toyota Sequoia. The update however does not include any of the details present in the 2005 report, so it is not certain if their previous assumptions of 109,000 miles (175,000 km) for a Prius lifetime versus 380,000 miles (610,000 km) or more for the lifetime of a large SUV are still being used, or if came from improved economies of scale.
Point #1, it's a new car that uses up more resources.
Point #2 ....get a polo 1.4TDI
Point #3 battery manufacture creates pollution
Point # 4
Point # 5 it looks gay.
I get 35mpg on the highway with this...
![]()
But still, to save money on gas (about $120/month), I'm moving from about 30 miles to 2 miles away from work on Monday.
I did the same thing! *except change 2 miles to under a mile*. I fill up weeks in between. Feels goooood.
I did the same thing! *except change 2 miles to under a mile*. I fill up weeks in between. Feels goooood.
Yeah seriously Phantom and Pitz, you guys just sound really lazy.
Not my favorite look, but I respect that car, lol. Would make a decent daily-driver when I have a nicer sports car.I get 40+ mpg on the highway with this:
IMAGE
Could you not walk the less-than-one-mile distance to work?
I'm saying this as a non-driver (yet). :bonce:
Yeah seriously Phantom and Pitz, you guys just sound really lazy.
Not my favorite look, but I respect that car, lol. Would make a decent daily-driver when I have a nicer sports car.
Back in my day, we had to drive to work barefoot, in the snow, uphill, both ways.
I like Prii. I looked at them a few years ago, but decided to buy a house instead. Maybe I'll just wait for one of these...
I don't know if all people who drive toyotas are retarded, but it seems all the retarded people drive toyotas. Just sayin'.
I get 40+ mpg on the highway with this:
[im]http://www.dandoes.net/misc/mini.jpg[/img]
Go test drive a Cooper S.
I don't know if all people who drive toyotas are retarded, but it seems all the retarded people drive toyotas. Just sayin'.
And all morons and red-necks drive American blocks of steel?