G-Man is Cave Johnson

Joined
Jan 20, 2010
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I just had this idea while watching a G-Man scene from Episode 2. Could G-Man be Cave Johnson, or at least some part of GlaDOS's construction? The reason I thought of this:

G-Man is into the testing of humans, like he seemed to be doing with Gordon in HL 1. Chell is being tested, albeit much more blatantly, in Portal.

We don't really know much about CJohnson. Perhaps G-man actually was just responsible for driving him insane?

Valve said they'd be tying in the two in the next game. Could this be it?

Also, it'd be really cool to have a co-op game with Gordon using Gravity Gun and Chell using the Portal gun. :D
 
We know enough about Cave Johnson, an insane businessman poisoned by mercury. Sounds like G-man, right?
 
Jesus christ kill me now.

At least you get credit for being [strike]the first[/strike] only the second person on the Internet to type that phrase. In a world of "G man is *" theories, that's hard to achieve.

Also, congratulations on having a not-at-all stereotypical first post ;)
 
We already know that the G Man is Gordon FreeMAN.

Can't you get that through your thick skulls? Am I the only rational person on this whole board?
 
Cave Johnson, an insane businessman poisoned by mercury.
The mercury in weapons-grade shower curtains though? I never really though we were supposed to take that site seriously...

This thread was so inevitable it has surprised me how long it took.
 
656pxfamilyportrait1.jpg

The g-man? Cave Johnson? Doug Lombardi?
 
We already know that the G Man is Gordon FreeMAN.

Can't you get that through your thick skulls? Am I the only rational person on this whole board?

Gordon Freeman isn't Gman, this has been proven.

You ARE joking right?
 
*snicker*

Not sure if that's for or against my argument, but no one knows who Gman is, because knowing Valve they will look for EVER POSSIBLE ANSWER that ANYONE has thought of, and just do something crazy that will make us cream ourselves, and it will make perfect sense.

No use guessing, we'll never know until it comes out, a guess is a guess, chances are it will be wrong.
 
Proven? By what?

Show me proof that Gordon isn't G-Man, and maybe I'll change my opinion.

You barley need proof. It's pretty obvious, since they only have like two distinguishable features that are alike.

Plus I'd like to see some solid proof that he is.
 
My argument is solid, then.

If you cannot prove that he is not Gman, then there is a possibility that he is.

Just like how you cannot prove that Steve Buscemi is not Phil Collins.
 
You don't need proof, just common sense. Proof is such a dirty word on the Internet.
 
You barley need proof. It's pretty obvious, since they only have like two distinguishable features that are alike.

Plus I'd like to see some solid proof that he is.

My argument is solid, then.

If you cannot prove that he is not Gman, then there is a possibility that he is.

Just like how you cannot prove that Steve Buscemi is not Phil Collins.

Nihilanth:
"you are man. . . he is. . . not man. . .for you he waits. . . for you"

seriously, people who think gordon is the gman are increadibly simple-minded.
 
A vague comment being used as proof? What are we, Evangelists?

you guys are hilarious
 
seriously, people who think acepilotf14 is serious about gordon being g-man are increadibly simple-minded.
 
My argument is solid, then.

If you cannot prove that he is not Gman, then there is a possibility that he is.

Just like how you cannot prove that Steve Buscemi is not Phil Collins.

Guess your right, but Valve are a bit more imaginative then that.
 
Back
Top