Man in court over Simpsons porn

4sjt3b.jpg



Edit: That didn't point to the message above like I thought it would.
 
Just think of all the millions of pedophiles in this world that never harmed any children. I wonder if cartoons like Simpson's joke porn would have triggered these sleeper cells!

Burn all art, books, films, photographs, etc. - just to be sure. Yes, cartoon drawings - especially cartoon drawings, because - well, they'll think of a reason. It makes the pedophile think it's okay, since they aren't real. But that's the thing. They aren't real.

Anyone getting aroused while watching the Simpsons could probably get aroused easier by looking at a pair of underwear, so they should ban underwear as well. Especially children's underwear! These could easily lead a pedo to attack! Children must be wrapped in thick blankets at all times, even while bathing - especially while bathing - that's when pedos might attack! They should be born into a chastity belt that covers the entire body.
 
The Leichhardt resident was convicted of possessing child exploitation material in 2003 after 59 sexual images of actual youngsters were found on his computer. He received two years probation with no conviction recorded.
Click to expand...
... Am I reading this right? He got off on probation for actual kiddie porn but was arrested for... cartoons?

**** Australian law, jesus.
 
That man is an idiot.

Who makes a child CARTOON porn?

Apparently, that sick and twisted man.


EDIT: tries to make a child cartoon porn?
 
Surely a paedophile turning away from actual pictures of children to cartoons is a healthy turn of events?
I'm not actually sure that's the case here of course.
 
FirstToStrike said:
That man is an idiot.

Who makes a child CARTOON porn?
Click to expand...
Seriously. I ask you, who's so fucked up in the head do you have to be to draw porn of cartoon characters, much less young cartoon characters? Drawing these innocent, heavily-stylized girls so that lonely guys on the internet can beat off to them. Who would do that? How twisted do you have to be? Well, I can't even imagine it.
 
FirstToStrike said:
That man is an idiot.

Who makes a child CARTOON porn?

Apparently, that sick and twisted man.


EDIT: tries to make a child cartoon porn?
Click to expand...

He downloaded some pictures of Simpson's characters having sex. It's a joke. The show has been on the air like 25 years - the longest running TV show of all time. That popularity makes it a target. Think of the website traffic you can generate from a still image of well known Simpson's characters having sex.

FirstToStrike said:
Who makes a child CARTOON porn?
Click to expand...
If I didn't know what you were trying to say, it would seem you are implying that these cartoons were made for children.

Also, have you not heard of 'cartoon porn' before or something? It's been around since before you were born.
 
VirusType2 said:
He downloaded some pictures of Simpson's characters having sex. It's a joke.

Think of the website traffic you can generate from a still image of well known Simpson's characters having sex.
Click to expand...
You don't actually believe Milner's "I thought they were funny" defense, do you? Come on now. Nobody downloads Simpsons porn and thinks of it as "a joke," unless you're laughing at that one Drawnsex strip with "Bart get out, I'm piss."

Also, website traffic from having Simpsons porn? Just what websites do you think are going to have that, and what kinds of traffic are they attracting? It's not like your average funny pics or daily jokes site is going to say, "Oh man, there's a picture of Lisa Simpson and Allison blowing the Comic Book Guy, that's goddamn hilarious! I'm gonna put this on Digg and get a million hits!"
 
Darkside55 said:
You don't actually believe Milner's "I thought they were funny" defense, do you? Come on now. Nobody downloads Simpsons porn and thinks of it as "a joke," unless you're laughing at that one Drawnsex strip with "Bart get out, I'm piss."
Click to expand...
You're serious. You think he was spanking it to it? I don't believe it at all, but, it's porn! He was obviously not there to do his homework or learn new recipes. Whether he is getting off to it or not, I don't see a point in arguing about it unless he admitted to it.

He could find something more realistic and erotic than The Simpsons when it comes to drawn porn, if sexual gratification was its main purpose. But I don't know any more than you. Maybe you're right, maybe he has a thing for The Simpsons.

Either way, I think it's really petty. Personally, I will fight for the right for people to draw anything they want, and touch their own body in any way they want, though I will say that maybe I'm not being imaginative enough to realize what anything could encompass.
Darkside55 said:
Also, website traffic from having Simpsons porn? Just what websites do you think are going to have that, and what kinds of traffic are they attracting? It's not like your average funny pics or daily jokes site is going to say, "Oh man, there's a picture of Lisa Simpson and Allison blowing the Comic Book Guy, that's goddamn hilarious! I'm gonna put this on Digg and get a million hits!"
Click to expand...

Cartoon porn websites! It's shock, gag (joke), cartoon porn! What easier way to draw people to a cartoon porn site than stealing The Simpson's 20-something years of popularity?

Fans doing a search on Simpsons - "oh wait, WTF is this? LOL, Darkside, look at this stupid shit I found.". "Oh hey, there's an entire website with porn of various popular cartoon characters!""Check it out, it's Disney toons ****ing each other."

I don't disagree with the fact that they busted him for because they had seized his computer. They can't turn a blind eye to it even if they wanted to. There are so many people working the case, and it's only one man's job to be the judge, and that's the judge himself.

But I don't see why they would want to ignore it in this case. They might have decided not to follow through with charges if he hadn't been an offender of something much more serious, and of real concern.
 
Virus, what you're saying might have been true a decade ago.

Now it's just old news and stupid.
 
Yeah, maybe the first Simpson's cartoon porn was a popular new thing many years ago. And it doesn't surprise me that it was something interesting to this guy. He's seems about as computer savvy and up with the times as the investigators who took a year to find this shit in his Recycling Bin.

Vegeta, not everyone has spent as much time ****ing around on the internet as we have, where nothing shocks, surprises, or amuses us any more.
 
VirusType2 said:
You're serious. You think he was spanking it to it? I don't believe it at all
Click to expand...
Oh, Virus. My dear, sweet, innocent Virus. I want to clutch you to my chest and pat your head, keeping you safe forever. You're too sweet and pure for this world, this terrible internet world of ours.

Cartoon porn websites! It's shock, gag (joke), cartoon porn!

"oh wait, WTF is this? LOL, Darkside, look at this stupid shit I found.". "Oh hey, there's an entire website with porn of various popular cartoon characters!""Check it out, it's Disney toons ****ing each other."
Click to expand...

people looking up cartoon porn, passing it on to their friends, and then laughing about it as a joke
Click to expand...
HE'S TOO PURE! HE'S JUST TOO PURE! Nobody fucking touch him! Nobody poison his thoughts! Nobody convince him otherwise! I swear to fucking god I will kill you with my own hands if you do. I will kill you WITH MY OWN HANDS. Virus can never be allowed to think otherwise of cartoon pornography. He's under my jurisdiction now, and I will goddamn kill you if say otherwise to him.

It's all just a joke, my dear Vee-2. Just things people draw these things for a laugh. Haha, Simpsons porn. It's funny, isn't it? We'll all have a big laugh about it. :)
 
Save your rage meter, man. VirusType2 is trollin'
 
Hahaha.

I want to believe he really is that naive though. I don't know why, it just makes me happy to think there's someone out there who truly believes there aren't people who obsess over Lisa Simpson, the PPG, and Violet Parr from the Incredibles enough to masturbate to drawings other people do of them. That the people who draw them are actually doing it as a parody, and NOT because they themselves want to see those characters in sexual situations, and derive a measure of pride and popularity from sharing it with others--others who are going to fap to the pics.

I dunno if V2 thought I was being a sarcastic jerk with my last post, but man...I really don't want anybody to burst the guy's bubble that people just laugh at these pictures and don't masturbate them. He gives me some kinda faith that there are pure people left on the internet.
 
I have one link that would shatter his world. An entire community of artists, writers, and fans dedicated to cartoon porn.

DS you probably know what site I'm talking about. Maybe.
 
I know of a whole lot of sites you could be talking about. Artists, writers, and fans? Pretty sure I know exactly which one you're talking about.
 
...I did Deus Ex pron once.
 
Awesome. Did it involve the Dragon's Tooth? That weapon makes you feel sexy.
 
Darkside55 said:
Awesome. Did it involve the Dragon's Tooth
Click to expand...
Maggie Chow and Max Chen sound like ready-made porn names. Tracer Tong is two vowels away from the specifications, but I'm not sure that Gordon Quick would last long in the industry.
 
These kinds of stories just fuel the fire of crap that is spreading in society these days.

For example, the whole 'kids' thing, where you can no longer physically 'punish' your child in public...or whatever.
I was with my older Sister in town one day, and her son (who was 7 at the time) saw a friend from school and naturally proceeded to blindly run at him. He just happened to be on the other side of the road, but we were in the High Street, so it was only for buses which come by fairly infrequently, but he still ran over a road without looking. So my sister grabbed him and smacked him, not shouting, but telling him how could he forget what he had learnt about crossing a road etc etc.

Some old woman came over and asked how she could publically abuse her child like that. I just burst out laughing, didnt say anything and sort of just turned away in disbelief. My sister naturally told her how else are you supposed to teach your child without linking the act to something they dont want. Kids hate getting smacked, so they learn from their mistake(s). And she has a point, you cant exactly drill something as important as learning how to cross a road into a child by asking them politely not to run across it again.

Ive been affected by 'taking pictures of my child' paranoia. I swear, some people are insane. I was in town at Uni, and one of my assignments was weirdly to take a few photos to justify your theory in Geography..or something along those lines.

Anyway, I was taking the pic in public, on a public road that lead into the high street. So I was perfectly within my rights to take pictures. I lined up a shot of a bank that was situated inside an old victorian-style building, and some kid ran across my line as I took the picture. This woman then came over to me, saying that the boy was her child, and she basically demanded to see the pictures on my camera or she'd call the police. So, as it was digital, I showed them to her as I couldnt be arsed to tell her I didnt need to comply and she could call the police etc. She made me delete the picture of the bank with her kid in it.

Some people are pathetic.
 
?ynast? said:
you cant exactly drill something as important as learning how to cross a road into a child by asking them politely not to run across it again
Click to expand...
Yes, you can. Nobody hit me to teach me how to cross roads.

I agree with you on the "taking pictures" part, though. Although in the 80s there was a big scare about that exact thing, where the news would tell parents not to let strangers take pictures of their children because some people had been taking photos of children they planned to abduct, and Robert Stack would be on Unsolved Mysteries like, "DON'T LET PEOPLE TAKE PICTURES OF YOUR CHILDREN."
 
Nobody had to hit me to teach me how to cross the road. Because I don't ever go outside.
 
Yes, but some kids learn better from getting sent to their room, and others learn better from a good sound thwack on the back of the head.

It's all about your type of child!
 
No cartoon character ever turned me on more as a kid as did Princess Jasmine.
 
.Officers discovered the computer would no longer turn on but a year later police forensic experts recovered 64 images of cartoon child exploitation material in the machine’s recycle bin
Click to expand...

Lol'd

But isn't this a little extreme?
 
Indeed it is.

A victimless crime is no crime at all.
 
Naph u so furry. :3

(Also goddamn what is even holding that shirt thing up the straps don't even sit on her shoulders was super glue even invented then.)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

MFL
Fascinating look at the ongoing psychological evolution of flat hieirarchies.
Replies
2
Views
2K
Tollbooth Willie
Tollbooth Willie
B
Dr. Rosenberg's cut appearance in Half-Life: Blue Shift
Replies
0
Views
5K
Barnz
B
B
Half-Life 2: Episode Two - Cyril, Fred, and friends
Replies
0
Views
5K
Barnz
B
B
Who's left or joined Valve in recent history
Replies
4
Views
32K
MFL
MFL
B
The cut missions of Half-Life: Decay
Replies
2
Views
20K
Evo
Evo
Back
Top